• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
WRAP

WRAP

Western Regional Advocacy Project

  • Donate Now
  • Get Email Updates
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • 20 Years of Unhoused People Fighting for Dignity + Respect
    • 40 Years of Fighting
    • History
    • Mission
    • Strategy
    • Members
    • Board / Staff
  • Campaigns
    • Business Improvement Districts
    • House Keys Not Sweeps
      • TARGETED, BANISHED, DISPLACED & SWEPT
    • Legal Defense Clinics Project
    • Homeless Bill of Rights
    • Without Housing
    • Street Outreach
  • Organizing Tools
    • Without Housing Organizing Toolkit
    • Homeless Bill of Rights Campaign Manual
    • WRAP Organizers Manual
    • WRAP Artwork
  • Resources
    • Pipe Dreams and Picket Fences Report
    • Art in Action Power Point Slide Show
    • Hobos to Street People
    • House Keys Book
    • Political Education
    • Legal Research
  • Media
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
    • Hobos to Street People Art Show
    • Street Newspapers
    • Sweeps Gallery Videos
    • Videos
  • Support Us
    • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Sustainer
    • Volunteer
    • Support WRAP
    • WRAP Newsletters & Updates Sign Up

Denver, CO. Press Release: Housing vouchers identifying mental health agency may lead to further discrimination

April 6, 2023 by Jonathan Leave a Comment

Press Release: Housing vouchers identifying mental health agency may lead to further discrimination, among other concerns

Quotes from residents:

“Why put a Mental Health program and a Mental Health Housing Voucher in play among the unhoused citizens who are’t mentally ill. Surely Colorado has mentally ill unhoused people among the unhoused. The housing voucher is valued at $1585 dollars and me and my peers should not be part of any such program. It’s obvious that the motive taken was to cover some money taken or to be taken. Someone please explain to me why St Francis Center, Well Power, the State Department of housing, and a City Official they say is the Mayor allow this. If he wanted to get some unhoused off the streets, the Mayor wouldn’t need a scheme or program. Just Do it!” – Jacque Findley

“St Francis a case manager says he assesses me and my peers for Mental Health Program and this Mental Health Housing Voucher says: Faud, Felony, Imprisonment. How could me and my peers here at St Francis Residence sign off on this lie that entraps us and cause us great duress telling us if we don’t sign off on this voucher our credit will be bad and we won’t be able to obtain housing in Colorado and they will evict us. So many Threats.” – Resident 

At the March 2023 quarterly Homeless Advisory Meeting hosted by the City of Denver, Jacque Findley addressed the Office of Housing and Stability (HOST) with concerns that her and her peers at the Warren Residences program had regarding their long-awaited housing vouchers. Upon receiving these vouchers, she realized that they named “Mental Health Center of Denver” as the agency through which these vouchers were received.

Upon speaking further with Jacque, she expressed concerns that these vouchers were specifically meant for those with mental health issues, and that she and her peers, who had never been treated nor diagnosed for such, were receiving these vouchers under the threat of being evicted from their current program if they did not use them.

Several concerns surfaced.

  1. What happens after program participants are expected to accept the label of mental health status in order to continue receiving shelter and resources?
  2. Is money specifically allocated for those with mental health issues being misappropriated to a different population?
  3. Is the houseless community automatically being assigned this label due to their socioeconomic hardship?
  4. Are these voucher recipients about to face a whole new level of discrimination, simply because the agency awarding the vouchers was printed on the front page?
  5. Will those who do have mental health issues, both apparent and not, face a disproportionate amount of discrimination from private landlords when they try to use these vouchers?

Jacque’s concerns are not unfounded. There are larger implications to this practice. 

  1. Houseless individuals are often forced into different qualifying boxes in order to be able to access resources, including applying for housing opportunities. This further complicates and lengthens the process, ultimately excluding many as a means of managing very limited quantities of housing. In the words of Paul Boden from Western Regional Advocacy Project (WRAP) in HAND’s recently released Housing Report Pipe Dreams & Picket Fences: Directions from Denver’s Houseless People on Housing Needs and Priorities in the Context of Today’s Public Housing, 

Instead of denying people for housing, they set up systems of intake and screening designed to maximize the number of people deemed ineligible for service so as to not admit to the fact that there isn’t anywhere near the adequate slots for housing, or treatment, or even emergency shelter at this point. When you don’t have the capacity to meet the demand, you make it harder to become eligible. In that way you’re not just telling people to ‘fuck off’, they ‘didn’t qualify’ for the ‘benevolent’ services you’re offering. ‘We don’t have to increase demand, they’re just not eligible’. The harder and more expensive it is to serve the population, the more stringent the intake requirements. (Pipe Dreams and Picket Fences, page 42)

Furthermore, individuals are unsure of the long-term effects of accepting an identity that they do not prescribe to, or even formally accepting one that they do belong to, wondering how this could limit them down the line. To demand that people accept such under threat of dismissal from the program is strong-arming them into a box they do not feel comfortable in. 

  • This speaks to a larger issue of program staff not properly/thoroughly explaining the process to voucher recipients. Concerns of misappropriation of federal funds meant for mental health arise when the voucher funding process isn’t clear. According to Pipe Dreams & Picket Fences, out of 786 houseless respondents, less than 50% knew what a housing voucher was and how it worked (Pipe Dreams and Picket Fences, page 76). With such a gap in education of housing vouchers despite being lauded as the primary pathway to housing today, more needs to be done to increase transparency around this process.
  • While the duress and oppression faced by houseless people can over time affect one’s mental health, automatically classifying this demographic as a whole as inherently mentally ill is problematic in its own right. If this were the case, wouldn’t poor or low-income people also be categorized as such? What does it mean when we interchange houseless, and all members of its population, with mentally ill?
  • When one of Jacque’s peers attempted to use the housing voucher at a Cornerstone property, as program staff had recommended, the property manager gave excuses as to why they would not accept it without outright stating so. Pipe Dreams & Picket Fences revealed “landlord discrimination” as the top reason for why respondents would not prefer a housing voucher over an actually affordable housing unit (Pipe Dreams and Picket Fences, page 82). In another excerpt from the Housing Report,

One study found that voucher holders needed to screen 39 apartment advertisements to find one potentially eligible unit. From there, many landlords of these potentially eligible units denied accepting vouchers outright or applied conditions to their acceptance (Cunningham, et al., 2018).(Pipe Dreams and Picket Fences, page 87)

This can have significant effects on the success rate of vouchers. By being dependent on acceptance by a landlord in the private market, receiving a voucher will not equate to receiving housing for most recipients as is. The following figure depicts their low success rate based on data from 2021: 

(Pipe Dreams and Picket Fences, page 89)

          In order to belong to the 8% of voucher recipients who were able to attain housing after their 

names were pulled in the voucher lottery (an even more abysmal 0.4% chance out of the 19,918 households who had applied for a housing voucher that year), one must beat the odds and surpass insurmountable barriers in their path. The effects of then having the agency “Mental Health Center of Denver” printed on the very first page of a voucher will surely not do these individuals any favors given the additional prejudice and discrimination faced by those who are mentally ill.

  • This leads to the final concern herein named – if neurotypical individuals without severe mental illness will be facing additional barriers when attempting to use these vouchers, one can only imagine the effects this would have on those who are already battling mental illness. It seems irresponsible and inappropriate for any mention of mental health needs to be listed on a housing voucher and becoming information shared with landlords. This is not only unnecessary, but also a violation of privacy and health information for those who do receive services through a mental health program. It should not be another factor weighed in landlords’ decisions, and could be easily removed from the documentation so they are indistinguishable from any other housing vouchers issued by the state. 

When processes relating to housing access for those without housing are not done under the direct leadership and involvement of those who are experiencing houselessness, then it opens the door for unexpected obstacles and barriers that render these processes ineffective. The State who issued these vouchers, and all elected officials and programs involved in perpetuating this discriminatory system should be held accountable for the effects felt by these vulnerable populations. Houseless people should not be forced to be categorized as “mentally ill” in order to receive housing.

Contact: info@housekeysactionnetwork.com 701-484-2634

Housekeys Action Network Denver

Towards rights, dignity, housing…

email info@housekeysactionnetwork.com 

phone 701-484-2634

Filed Under: #housekeysnothandcuffs, Civil & Human Rights, Colorado, Denver, Housekeys Action Network Denver, Legal Defense, WRAP Members

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Footer

Instagram Feed

Join WRAP on Tuesday, July 22 on zoom at 3pm pt | Join WRAP on Tuesday, July 22 on zoom at 3pm pt | 4 pm mt | 6 pm et for a training on the different methodologies, context and implementation of street outreach! There will be examples from WRAP members who represent organizations in different states who have been fighting back against criminalization and sweeps in their communities.
Accountable organizing through street outreach! 

With sweeps and fascist policing/immigration tactics ramping up all over the country, we must make sure our initiatives to fight them are informed by, come from and are supported by the people who are directly impacted!!! 

Street outreach is how we do this! 

📣 WRAP : STREET OUTREACH TRAINING 
🗓️ Tuesday, July 22 | 🕒 3pm PT | 4pm MT | 6pm ET
🎟️ RSVP : bit.ly/wrapoutreach 
✉️ Contact joemae@wraphome.org for any questions

Read More: https://conta.cc/3ZXkCxS
Last year, on April 22nd, I stood with over 700 pe Last year, on April 22nd, I stood with over 700 people from around the country in front of the US Supreme Court demanding that the court focus on proven solutions to homelessness like housing, and not on things like handcuffs and jails that make homelessness worse. Months later, SCOTUS shamefully decided that homeless people are not included in the Constitution’s protections against cruel and unusual punishment and could be ticketed or arrested for simply sleeping outside. https://conta.cc/44m9rjl
The city continues to sneak in their sweeps of our The city continues to sneak in their sweeps of our friends and neighbors to nowhere. They sneak their sweeps in and hope those that care and give a sh&! against this violence won’t show up. We will do all we can to challenge this and won’t let the city block us from the community care they are afraid of.

Join us for a virtual gathering to learn how to show up, how to build community care. July 10th from 7-8:30pm. DM us for more info.

#sweepskill #fucksweeps #stopthesweeps #stoptheharrellhorrorshow #communitycare #showup
🏠Housing is a human right, and it is about time 🏠Housing is a human right, and it is about time our communities actually accept this!

On June 28th 2024, Grants Pass v Johnson was overturned (a case that had required cities to not criminalize the unhoused if adequate shelter was not provided by the city). On June 28th from 10am-12pm, we are asking our community to gather on the Missoula Courthouse lawn to show our city that we don’t support the ways they are criminalizing unhoused Missoulians. 📣

After the rally, from 12-2pm we will hear from various local organizations that are impacted and addressing this issue in our community. 🫂 From those working in the legal system to renters to mutual aid groups, our entire community is impacted by the overturning of Grants Pass v Johnson, the closure of the Johnson Street shelter, and the criminalization of unhoused Missoulians. Municipal elections are coming up this year and it is critical that we show city council where our priorities lie.
The Sovereign Roses Virtual Alumni Chapter invites The Sovereign Roses Virtual Alumni Chapter invites you to WRAP with the Roses! Learn more about the Western Regional Advocacy Project (WRAP) and a potential Project I.M.P.A.C.T area we’re exploring. WRAP is dedicated to ending homelessness and poverty by uplifting the voices of those directly impacted and advocating for systemic change rooted in justice and equity.
Discover why WEE believe that partnering with WRAP is a powerful step toward making a real, sustainable difference in our communities.

📅 Date: June 30

🕔 Time: 5:52 PM CST

📍 Zoom:
Meeting ID: 98812438845
Code: 567524

🌐 Learn more about WRAP: www.wraphome.org (http://www.wraphome.org/)

Together, we can push for change, challenge injustice, and build impact that lasts. Don’t miss this opportunity to get informed and get involved!

#GammaSigmaSigma #ServiceSorority #SRVAC #WRAP #Projectimpact #GSS #SFE #ServiceFriendshipEquailty
June 28th marks the One Year Anniversary of the Su June 28th marks the One Year Anniversary of the Supreme Court making it illegal to be homeless. Join me in the fight to push back! Helen Cruz
June 28 4-7pm | Echo Park Lake, LA for more inform June 28 4-7pm | Echo Park Lake, LA
for more information: @lacanetwork_official
Instagram post 18073374346940611 Instagram post 18073374346940611
City Council Vote on Salvation Army Shelter Contra City Council Vote on Salvation Army Shelter Contract TODAY Monday 

The City Council is set to vote on renewing the Salvation Army’s contract to run Crossroads shelter today (Monday), and then set to discuss renewing their contract to run the Doubletree on Wednesday. 

Read More: https://wraphome.org/2025/06/16/denver-co-city-council-vote-on-salvation-army-shelter-contract-today-monday/
Since SCOTUS allowed cities to arrest and ticket p Since SCOTUS allowed cities to arrest and ticket people for experiencing homelessness a year ago, 250+ anti-homeless bills have been introduced across the US.
Join us June 17 w/ to discuss how we're fighting back. RSVP: https://buff.ly/1NFKz9F
Follow on Instagram

Facebook Icon

Facebook Feed

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

This content isn't available right now

When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted.
12 hours ago
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • likes 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

0 CommentsComment on Facebook

Twitter Icon

Twitter Feed

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

YouTube icon

Youtube Code

Our Channel

Copyright © 2025 Western Regional Advocacy Project WRAP · Log in