• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
WRAP

WRAP

Western Regional Advocacy Project

  • Donate Now
  • Get Email Updates
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • History
    • Mission
    • Strategy
    • Members
    • Board / Staff
  • Campaigns
    • Business Improvement Districts
    • House Keys Not Sweeps
    • Homeless Bill of Rights
    • Oregon Right To Rest
    • Without Housing
    • Street Outreach
  • Organizing Tools
    • Without Housing Organizing Toolkit
    • Homeless Bill of Rights Campaign Manual
    • WRAP Organizers Manual
    • WRAP Artwork
  • Resources
    • Art in Action Power Point Slide Show
    • Hobos to Street People
    • House Keys Book
    • Political Education
    • Legal Research
  • Media
    • Blog
    • Hobos to Street People Art Show
    • Street Newspapers
    • Sweeps Gallery Videos
    • Videos
  • Support Us
    • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Sustainer
    • Volunteer
    • Support WRAP
    • WRAP Newsletters & Updates Sign Up

Denver, CO. HAND Statement on Denver’s “Expanding Affordable Housing’ Plan Contact City Council to Ask for Better!

March 29, 2022 by Jonathan Leave a Comment

The passage of HB21-1117 to allow cities to require that new developments include ‘affordable housing’ is a good pathway to creating more housing built at more affordable prices. The need for housing developments to be required to charge lower rents is critical. Without this we have seen how developers and landlords will simply sell or rent to the highest bidder, making more and more people houseless. 

With that said, however, Denver’s proposed ‘Expanding Affordable Housing Plan’ for implementation of this policy falls far short of what would be possible under HB21-1117 to expand affordable housing. 

The current proposal would require new residential developments of 10 units or more to designate between 8% and 10% of the units as ‘affordable.’ Even according to the City’s financial feasibility study, this % could be increased. Denver could and should require 15% to 20% affordability, in particular in neighborhoods more vulnerable to displacement.  

The linkage fee in the current proposal, which allows developers building less than 10 units that are not affordable to pay a fee instead of building affordable units, is currently proposed to gradually increase to between $4 a square foot and $8 a square foot, depending on the type and location of development. These current amounts are not even within the range recommended by the City’s own feasibility study. Current levels also do not account for inflation, which is expected to rise 7-8% over the next year. And these levels are not comparable to peer cities, including Austin and Boston, which have linkage fees ranging from $12-$18 per sq foot. Denver could and should make this linkage fee the highest possible fee to ensure affordable housing is built and ensure funds collected if not have the highest possible impact. 

This proposal, as it stands, will not directly create any housing for people under 50% AMI. Again, let us be clear, this proposal does not require developers to build any housing under 50% AMI. The only way anything from this proposal will affect low income and houseless people is if funds from the linkage fees paid are used for actual low income housing. Developers should be required to build housing at and below 50% AMI, including housing at or below 30% AMI. Furthermore, all linkage fee dollars should be earmarked for housing under 50% AMI. 

If this proposal passes, especially if it passes as is, be it noted that this does not create housing for houseless or very poor people. The City cannot try to use the existence of this policy to say they are creating housing for poor or houseless people. 

We stand with a large coalition of community organizations, services providers, and poor people making these demands to make the affordable housing requirements the strongest they can possibly be under state law. 

Please contact your council person and ask that they support these changes to make more affordable housing. Find your council person’s contact information here https://www.denvergov.org/Government/Agencies-Departments-Offices/Agencies-Departments-Offices-Directory/Denver-City-Council/Council-Members 

See details of the HOST proposal for breakdowns of AMI level here:

Staff Recommendation for high market areas 

The applicant may choose from two on-site build options: 

On-Site Option 1: • Rental: 10% of total units up to 60% AMI • Ownership: 10% of total units up to 80% AMI; 

or On-Site Option 2: • Rental: 15% of total units averaging 70% AMI serving households with incomes up to 80% AMI • Ownership: 15% of total units averaging 90% AMI serving households with incomes up to 100% AMI 

Staff Recommendation for typical market areas 

The applicant may choose from two on-site build options: 

On-Site Option 1: • Rental: 8% of total units up to 60% AMI • Ownership: 8% of total units up to 80% AMI;

or On-Site Option 2: • Rental: 12% of total units averaging up to 70% AMI serving households with incomes from 50% to 80% AMI • Ownership: 12% of total units averaging up to 90% AMI serving households with incomes from 60% to 100% AMI


Read the Full HOST policy report here: https://denvergov.org/files/assets/public/community-planning-and-development/documents/zoning/text-amendments/housing-affordability/eha_proposed-policy-approach_febuary_2022.pdf

Housekeys Action Network Denver

email info@housekeysactionnetwork.com 

Towards rights, dignity, housing…

phone 701-484-2634

Filed Under: Advocacy, Affordable Housing, Colorado, Housekeys Action Network Denver, Organizing, WRAP Members

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Instagram Feed

Saturday AUGUST 27 — 9 am to 4pm Sunday AUGUST 2 Saturday AUGUST 27 — 9 am to 4pm
Sunday AUGUST 28 — 12:30pm to 4pm

Westminster Presbyterian Church
1300 N Street, Sacramento

https://wraphome.org/2022/08/02/sacramento-ca-advocates-community-summit-on-homelessness-august-27-28th/
California. (S)Care Court Hearing Tomorrow 8/3 Las California. (S)Care Court Hearing Tomorrow 8/3 Last Hearing before floor Vote
https://conta.cc/3vzRoWo
Part 11 ... California’s “anti-Okie” laws of Part 11 ...
California’s “anti-Okie” laws of the 1930s and the South’s Jim Crow laws in effect from the late 1800s to the 1950s are examples of the kinds of local laws overturned in previous generations. Yet, modern “quality of life” legislation and enforcement targeting homeless people can be found in communities across the nation.
The City Council postponed their vote on the 41.18 The City Council postponed their vote on the 41.18 expansion to August 2nd. If passed, this motion will add approximately 1,900 additional sites–a 376% increase in exclusionary zones across the city. 41.18 would then cover at least 88 sq miles (that’s 20% of the entire city).

Services Not Sweeps is urging EVERYONE to come to City Hall at 9:00am on August 2 and tell City Council that 41.18 is BAD POLICY and should be repealed.

When we fight, we win. 
But this fight isn’t over.

The community flooded City Hall inside and out on Wednesday to protest the expansion of 41.18 but the fight is not over. It’s clear that President Nury Martinez and friends weren’t prepared for our numbers and realized they were unable to rally their (few but loud) 41.18 supporters. Council delayed the vote to Tuesday August 2nd in an attempt to erode our momentum and stifle our voices. 
 
We won’t let that happen. The fight now is to keep the pressure on and show up next week!! See you next Tuesday 9am. Bring a friend.
 
WHO: You and your friends!
WHERE: City Hall, 200 N Spring St 
WHEN: Tuesday August 2nd at 9:00am
HOW: Read more details on our toolkit.
AGENDA ITEM 14 https://lacity.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=102513
Part 10... In fact, however, enforcement is very m Part 10...
In fact, however, enforcement is very much impacted by both skin color and appearance. Local governments cannot legally discriminate against people strictly because they do not have housing. Federal protections prohibit local and state governments from removing people from their communities due to the color of their skin or economic/employment status.
Part 9... This nationwide pattern has escaped Civi Part 9... This nationwide pattern has escaped Civil Rights protections because on their face, these programs are not clearly discriminatory. Local laws are often drafted in such a way as to appear to apply equally to all people in a community.
Part 8... While certain communities highlight diff Part 8...
While certain communities highlight different controls at different times, often depending upon the outcome of local elections and legislative and court efforts, all have one primary common goal: to remove the presence and resulting impact of people without housing from local communities. As the Mayor of Las Vegas stated when she outlawed feeding people in city parks: “If we stop feeding them, they will leave.”
Part 7... This type of ticket is not uncommon. The Part 7...
This type of ticket is not uncommon. The most common public space and activity restrictions are those aimed at camping, sitting, lying, or trespassing on either public or private land, panhandling, sleeping, blocking the sidewalk and possessing “stolen property,” such as shopping carts and milk crates—to name just a few. Furthermore, these restrictions are often implemented in conjunction with the closure of public parks and the outlawing of free food and clothing distribution.
SAVE THE DATE. Day of Action Against Care Court – Monday August 1. For more information: https://wraphome.org/2022/07/21/save-the-date-day-of-action-against-care-court-monday-august-1/
Part 6... According to the non-profit organization Part 6...
According to the non-profit organization Religious Witness with Homeless People, (RWHP) homeless individuals face anxiety, degradation, and frustration as a result of the aggressive enforcement of “quality of life” ordinances. This anxiety is expressed by one homeless individual in one of nearly 200 interviews 50 Case Studies Analysis conducted by RWHP: “You’re always on edge out here already because it’s dangerous. I can’t go to the cops now because they’ll probably just arrest me because of the (camping) tickets.”
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Facebook Icon

Facebook Feed

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

... See MoreSee Less

6 minutes ago
Video image
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Twitter Icon

Twitter Feed

Retweet on Twitter WRAP Retweeted
2 Aug 1554448737400983554

NEW EPISODE of Fixing Our City. Houston set out to end chronic homelessness. It cut its homeless population by more than half in a decade, according to PIT counts. This week's fix: how do San Francisco’s initiatives compare with Houston's success story?
http://www.sfchronicle.com/podcasts/article/Listen-Houston-s-homelessness-strategy-could-17343410.php

Reply on Twitter 1554448737400983554 Retweet on Twitter 1554448737400983554 4 Like on Twitter 1554448737400983554 7 Twitter 1554448737400983554
Retweet on Twitter WRAP Retweeted
6 Aug 1555712854959046661

Trust first - https://mailchi.mp/hospitalityhouse.org/trust-first “I had to build a rapport so they trusted me.” Read about Hospitality House's experimental approach to housing in The Frisc and the SF Chronicle podcast Fixing Our City.

Image for the Tweet beginning: Trust first -  “I Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Trust first -  “I Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Trust first -  “I Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1555712854959046661 Retweet on Twitter 1555712854959046661 0 Like on Twitter 1555712854959046661 1 Twitter 1555712854959046661
43m 1556685060702552069

Moving SF’s Homeless to Permanent Homes Hasn’t Been Easy. One Nonprofit Tried Something New by Kristi Coale

Image for twitter card

Moving SF‘s Homeless to Permanent Homes Hasn‘t Been Easy. One Nonprofit Tried Something New

Luck and a lot of work let a large cohort all move together. This ‘experiment‘ could spur other efforts...

thefrisc.com

Reply on Twitter 1556685060702552069 Retweet on Twitter 1556685060702552069 0 Like on Twitter 1556685060702552069 1 Twitter 1556685060702552069
Retweet on Twitter WRAP Retweeted
4 Aug 1555250996741189632

#Berkeley mayor cancels meeting which was to propose lifting the ban on tear-gas against protesters. https://twitter.com/JesseArreguin/status/1555243449040793605

Jesse Arreguin #GetVaccinated @JesseArreguin

@bedwardstiek I’m canceling the meeting. Our policy stands and shame on the Sheriff for threatening to not provide emergency support to Berkeley.

Reply on Twitter 1555250996741189632 Retweet on Twitter 1555250996741189632 8 Like on Twitter 1555250996741189632 22 Twitter 1555250996741189632
4 Aug 1555249613858168832

URGENT: at 8:15 tonight Aug 4th Berkeley City Council plans to temporarily lift ban on chemical weapons such as teargas and pepper spray for the purpose of using them on People’s Park protestors.

Image for twitter card

Where do we go Berkeley. URGENT - WRAP

URGENT: at 8:15 tonight Aug 4th Berkeley City Council plans to temporarily lift ban on chemical weapons such as ...

wraphome.org

Reply on Twitter 1555249613858168832 Retweet on Twitter 1555249613858168832 3 Like on Twitter 1555249613858168832 1 Twitter 1555249613858168832
Load More...

YouTube icon

Youtube Code

Our Channel

Copyright © 2022 Western Regional Advocacy Project WRAP · Log in