• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
WRAP

WRAP

Western Regional Advocacy Project

  • Donate Now
  • Get Email Updates
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • History
    • Mission
    • Strategy
    • Members
    • Board / Staff
  • Campaigns
    • Business Improvement Districts
    • House Keys Not Sweeps
    • Homeless Bill of Rights
    • Oregon Right To Rest
    • Without Housing
    • Street Outreach
  • Organizing Tools
    • Without Housing Organizing Toolkit
    • Homeless Bill of Rights Campaign Manual
    • WRAP Organizers Manual
    • WRAP Artwork
  • Resources
    • Art in Action Power Point Slide Show
    • Hobos to Street People
    • House Keys Book
    • Political Education
    • Legal Research
  • Media
    • Blog
    • Hobos to Street People Art Show
    • Street Newspapers
    • Sweeps Gallery Videos
    • Videos
  • Support Us
    • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Sustainer
    • Volunteer
    • Support WRAP
    • WRAP Newsletters & Updates Sign Up

Portland, OR. Handcuffed and Unhoused

December 18, 2021 by Jonathan 1 Comment

 Handcuffed and Unhoused, data reporter Melissa Lewis and producer Emily Harris investigate what happens when local residents call police on unhoused people in their neighborhood, analyzing arrest data across six major West Coast cities with large homeless populations. In Portland, Oregon, for example, most calls to police about unhoused people weren’t about criminal behavior. 

Yet an officer with a gun is dispatched, contributing to a high volume of arrests for what are often minor infractions.

Here’s what Lewis’ data analysis found: 

  • Across the six West Coast cities, people living on the streets are consistently more likely to be arrested than their neighbors who live in houses. In Portland, unhoused people make up at most 2% of the population, but they account for nearly half of all arrests in the city. 

  • Many of the arrests were for smaller, nonviolent offenses – 35% were for misdemeanors and another 43% were for warrants (often for things like missing a court date).

  • In Portland, the city receives calls about unhoused people an average of at least 80 times a day.

In the show, Lewis meets with neighbors in Portland’s Lents neighborhood at a free Friday night dinner in Lents Park. She follows the journey of a houseless man who was arrested 14 times over the last five years. Five of those arrests were for criminal charges – all misdemeanors like shoplifting at Walmart and having small amounts of meth. The rest were on warrants for things like missing court dates. Lewis tracks the meth possession case as it moves through the court system, highlighting the hurdles for someone experiencing homelessness to get out of the criminal justice system once they’re in it. Things like remembering your court date and showing up on time are difficult when you don’t have a phone, access to electricity, or reliable transportation. 

I talked with Lewis about cities that have long turned to police as the mechanism for making homelessness disappear. But arrests don’t solve a housing crisis. 

There’s a lot of misconceptions around people who are houseless. How does your reporting counter some of those stereotypes?  

Melissa Lewis: The primary misconception is that they’re a monolith. I feel like reporting on homelessness typically casts anybody living outside as either a hero or a villain. And they’re not. That is also described as a “sin or sickness model” of unhoused people: Either they are hapless victims or they chose this. I think people are going to better identify with what is actually happening if they have a fuller sense of a houseless person as an actual person. I think it’s really important to illustrate that maybe they’re choosing not to go into a shelter because it mandates attending religious services or because they can’t bring their stuff, their pets or their partner.

How did reporting this story complicate your understanding of the relationship between houseless people and police? 

Lewis: I think the reporting actually uncomplicated a few things. When I worked on this previously for The Oregonian (for a 2018 story that found half of all arrests were of homeless people), I had no clue why it was happening. The police said the numbers were driven by calls for service – you know, people calling 911 and complaining. When I talk to sources for this story, people think that I’m reporting on it because I think cops hate homeless people. But I think the individual dispositions of the people policing our communities shouldn’t matter. This is about city priorities. What this story showed me was how Byzantine city infrastructure is for responding to homelessness. Sources described a lack of coordination. I encountered police officers who didn’t fully understand the nature of the warrants they were arresting people on. If somebody is arrested in two different counties, those counties aren’t talking. There’s often different judges signing every single warrant. There’s no coordination that allows any individual within the system to see the full scope of what they’re doing. 

So reporting this story helped you understand why people get kind of stuck in the cycle of the criminal justice system?

Lewis: Yeah, it feels like something out of a Kafka novel. It’s paperwork on paperwork. I’m a programmer, a data analyst, I have training as a lab scientist, and it was hard for me to parse what time the person I was reporting on was even supposed to show up to court. There are tremendous barriers. And on top of that, people are just trying to survive. Every minute you’re spending trying to disentangle yourself from the criminal legal system is a minute you’re not spending getting yourself out of homelessness. 

When people listen to this, they might ask, “So what do we do about it?” Do you feel like your reporting found any kind of strategies to improve the situation? 

Lewis: [There’s] one concrete thing I’m excited about, and it’s still not perfect, but it’s something San Francisco has done. They have the same problem as Portland: Somebody is cited for camping or a really low-level crime. They’re unhoused. They’re supposed to come to court. They don’t. They may not remember when the court date is or they may not have a phone or anything to track time. So they don’t show up. And then the judge issues a warrant for failure to appear. Then they could be arrested, they’re brought in, they have a new court date, they failed to appear and so on and so on. San Francisco ended that practice. That doesn’t erase the underlying charges – you’re charged with camping, that remains – but you’re not going to get these cascading “failure to appear” warrants. They recognize that, like the evidence showed, it wasn’t working. This is a costly and ineffective response that our region is having to this issue. So we can stop that. What is the point of the criminal legal system? It’s not to rack up fees. It’s not to continue arresting people. So what are we spending our time and money on?

Listen to the episode:  Handcuffed and Unhoused

Filed Under: #right2rest, #StopTheSweeps, Civil & Human Rights, Oregon, Poverty

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. They Them says

    January 2, 2022 at 6:47 pm

    You present a narrow view of reality that neglects the lived experiences of people who pay taxes that fund the operations of a city. You’re idealistic view of the homeless does not square with the reality of lived consequences (you have a court date, and it’s your responsibility to keep track of it, no one else’s). Why are you letting them off the hook, when every other citizen is bound to the rule? That sounds like bigotry to me.

    Your failed social experiment is smearing the streets of Portland. If you cannot see that your approach has failed, you’re blind, ignorant, or both.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Instagram Feed

Part 12... Infractions and Due Process Rights Ant Part 12...
Infractions and Due Process Rights 
Anti-homeless laws and ordinances and their application have, in fact, created a loophole that allows for the circumvention of a homeless person’s right to due process under law. The process by which homeless people face repeated incarceration generally follows this scenario: A homeless man is sleeping on the sidewalk. A local ordinance makes it illegal to do so. The man gets a ticket and is later arrested for not paying the ticket. He spends a couple of days in jail, and is just as homeless now as he was before, only now he has a criminal record. This was the case for many of the individuals interviewed by RWHP. One man relayed the familiar scenario, “I was sleeping in a tent in a hidden spot near the freeway. They gave me a ticket for trespassing. I don’t have money to pay it. I’ve never been in jail before. I keep to myself, but now they’re going to make me a convict just for sleeping.”
SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT TALKING DOWN THE PEOPLES TOWMH SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT TALKING DOWN THE PEOPLES TOWMHOMES ENCAMPMENT https://www.instagram.com/tv/ChAT9N5jNTY/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

This morning @phillysheriff ‘s came and evicted our protest encampment to Save the UC Townhomes. When asked why they were doing it, Rochelle Bilal responded that she “felt compassion for the townhomes residents but was just doing my job”

Even if the tents are gone WE AINT GOIN NOWHERE‼️
Saturday AUGUST 27 — 9 am to 4pm Sunday AUGUST 2 Saturday AUGUST 27 — 9 am to 4pm
Sunday AUGUST 28 — 12:30pm to 4pm

Westminster Presbyterian Church
1300 N Street, Sacramento

https://wraphome.org/2022/08/02/sacramento-ca-advocates-community-summit-on-homelessness-august-27-28th/
California. (S)Care Court Hearing Tomorrow 8/3 Las California. (S)Care Court Hearing Tomorrow 8/3 Last Hearing before floor Vote
https://conta.cc/3vzRoWo
Part 11 ... California’s “anti-Okie” laws of Part 11 ...
California’s “anti-Okie” laws of the 1930s and the South’s Jim Crow laws in effect from the late 1800s to the 1950s are examples of the kinds of local laws overturned in previous generations. Yet, modern “quality of life” legislation and enforcement targeting homeless people can be found in communities across the nation.
The City Council postponed their vote on the 41.18 The City Council postponed their vote on the 41.18 expansion to August 2nd. If passed, this motion will add approximately 1,900 additional sites–a 376% increase in exclusionary zones across the city. 41.18 would then cover at least 88 sq miles (that’s 20% of the entire city).

Services Not Sweeps is urging EVERYONE to come to City Hall at 9:00am on August 2 and tell City Council that 41.18 is BAD POLICY and should be repealed.

When we fight, we win. 
But this fight isn’t over.

The community flooded City Hall inside and out on Wednesday to protest the expansion of 41.18 but the fight is not over. It’s clear that President Nury Martinez and friends weren’t prepared for our numbers and realized they were unable to rally their (few but loud) 41.18 supporters. Council delayed the vote to Tuesday August 2nd in an attempt to erode our momentum and stifle our voices. 
 
We won’t let that happen. The fight now is to keep the pressure on and show up next week!! See you next Tuesday 9am. Bring a friend.
 
WHO: You and your friends!
WHERE: City Hall, 200 N Spring St 
WHEN: Tuesday August 2nd at 9:00am
HOW: Read more details on our toolkit.
AGENDA ITEM 14 https://lacity.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=102513
Part 10... In fact, however, enforcement is very m Part 10...
In fact, however, enforcement is very much impacted by both skin color and appearance. Local governments cannot legally discriminate against people strictly because they do not have housing. Federal protections prohibit local and state governments from removing people from their communities due to the color of their skin or economic/employment status.
Part 9... This nationwide pattern has escaped Civi Part 9... This nationwide pattern has escaped Civil Rights protections because on their face, these programs are not clearly discriminatory. Local laws are often drafted in such a way as to appear to apply equally to all people in a community.
Part 8... While certain communities highlight diff Part 8...
While certain communities highlight different controls at different times, often depending upon the outcome of local elections and legislative and court efforts, all have one primary common goal: to remove the presence and resulting impact of people without housing from local communities. As the Mayor of Las Vegas stated when she outlawed feeding people in city parks: “If we stop feeding them, they will leave.”
Part 7... This type of ticket is not uncommon. The Part 7...
This type of ticket is not uncommon. The most common public space and activity restrictions are those aimed at camping, sitting, lying, or trespassing on either public or private land, panhandling, sleeping, blocking the sidewalk and possessing “stolen property,” such as shopping carts and milk crates—to name just a few. Furthermore, these restrictions are often implemented in conjunction with the closure of public parks and the outlawing of free food and clothing distribution.
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Facebook Icon

Facebook Feed

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

... See MoreSee Less

4 days ago
Part 12...
Infractions and Due Process Rights 

Anti-homeless laws and ordinances and their application have, in fact, created a loophole that allows for the circumvention of a homeless person’s right to due process under law. The process by which homeless people face repeated incarceration generally follows this scenario: A homeless man is sleeping on the sidewalk. A local ordinance makes it illegal to do so. The man gets a ticket and is later arrested for not paying the ticket. He spends a couple of days in jail, and is just as homeless now as he was before, only now he has a criminal record. This was the case for many of the individuals interviewed by RWHP. One man relayed the familiar scenario, “I was sleeping in a tent in a hidden spot near the freeway. They gave me a ticket for trespassing. I don’t have money to pay it. I’ve never been in jail before. I keep to myself, but now they’re going to make me a convict just for sleeping.”
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Twitter Icon

Twitter Feed

8 Aug 1556771690356453376

Part 12...
Infractions and Due Process Rights
Anti-homeless laws and ordinances and their application have, in fact, created a loophole that allows for the circumvention of a homeless person’s right to due process under law.

Reply on Twitter 1556771690356453376 Retweet on Twitter 1556771690356453376 0 Like on Twitter 1556771690356453376 1 Twitter 1556771690356453376
8 Aug 1556762429144514561

SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT TALKING DOWN THE PEOPLES TOWMHOMES ENCAMPMENT
“felt compassion for the townhomes residents but was just doing my job”
Even if the tents are gone WE AINT GOIN NOWHERE‼️

Image for the Tweet beginning: SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT TALKING DOWN THE Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1556762429144514561 Retweet on Twitter 1556762429144514561 1 Like on Twitter 1556762429144514561 2 Twitter 1556762429144514561
8 Aug 1556733329566707713

Press Release: Beyond the Virginia Key Bantustan, reject any tiny homes plan that excludes homeless input - WRAP

Press Release: Beyond the Virginia Key Bantustan, reject any tiny homes plan that excludes homeless input - WRAP

October 22nd Alliance to End Homelessness Press Release August 8, 2022 Beyond the Virginia Key Bantustan, reject any...

wraphome.org

Reply on Twitter 1556733329566707713 Retweet on Twitter 1556733329566707713 2 Like on Twitter 1556733329566707713 3 Twitter 1556733329566707713
8 Aug 1556694552550903808

Los Angeles Homeless Sweeps Taxpayers pay over $70 million each year for the Los Angeles Police Department and LA Sanitation to displace homeless people under the guise of street cleaning. via @YouTube

Image for twitter card

Los Angeles Homeless Sweeps

Taxpayers pay over $70 million each year for the Los Angeles Police Department and LA Sanitation to displace homel...

youtube.com

Reply on Twitter 1556694552550903808 Retweet on Twitter 1556694552550903808 3 Like on Twitter 1556694552550903808 2 Twitter 1556694552550903808
Retweet on Twitter WRAP Retweeted
2 Aug 1554448737400983554

NEW EPISODE of Fixing Our City. Houston set out to end chronic homelessness. It cut its homeless population by more than half in a decade, according to PIT counts. This week's fix: how do San Francisco’s initiatives compare with Houston's success story?

Image for twitter card

Houston’s homelessness strategy could be a roadmap

Fixing Our City podcast: Texas’ largest city is getting national attention for its...

www.sfchronicle.com

Reply on Twitter 1554448737400983554 Retweet on Twitter 1554448737400983554 4 Like on Twitter 1554448737400983554 7 Twitter 1554448737400983554
Load More...

YouTube icon

Youtube Code

Our Channel

Copyright © 2022 Western Regional Advocacy Project WRAP · Log in